In honor of my son’s birthday and before things get too busy at NOVA, I thought to put down a few words—and a map—predicting the presidential election on November 8. These humble predictions are built on a few premises:
- Voter turnout will be high, averaging 60% or more of eligible voters.
- The Clinton campaign maintains discipline and resolves computer vulnerabilities. With two successful senatorial campaigns under her belt, she presides over a fourth presidential campaign.
- The Trump campaign continues its chaotic rampage, alienating key states and ethnic groups. He is a novice at political campaigns, which is appealing to those who despise the so-called political elite.
- The media harasses both candidates relentlessly.
- The polls purport to show a close race, so pollsters can get paid.
On Election Day, Clinton should win with at least 348 electoral votes, versus some 140 for Trump. A candidate needs 270 electoral votes to become U.S. President. A brief analysis of key states on the map:
Virginia. Details on why Virginia will go to Clinton can be found in my recent blog, Is Virginia a Swing State?
North Carolina. Republican Governor Pat McCrory, deeply unpopular, is in a close race for reelection; also, a federal appeals court overturned a new voter ID law. Dismissal of the voter ID law would help Democrats get more votes.
Florida. Trump has managed to offend the 3.2 million African Americans and 4.8 million Hispanics in the state. Even Cuban Americans, who normally vote Republican, will likely defect. Independent voters should align with the larger Democratic electorate to win Florida for Clinton. Meanwhile the Senate race in Florida could be the nation’s most expensive.
Ohio. At this time, Republican Governor John Kasich does not endorse Trump, meaning a divided GOP in Ohio, adding to the likelihood that Clinton will garner the state, as Obama did in 2008 and 2012.
Nebraska’s 2nd Congressional District. Clinton should earn one electoral vote from Omaha, with its large minority population, as outlined in Electoral Geography 2016. The Oracle of Omaha, Warren Buffett, is a key Clinton supporter.
States Too Close to Call (Swing States)
A generic Republican candidate would win the states below, but Donald Trump is a decidedly unconventional candidate and his campaign’s missteps could cost him a number of previously red states, as shown on the map.
Missouri. This state is a target for the Clinton campaign, as it has a history of electing Democrats statewide. The Obama campaign lost Missouri in 2008 by only 4,000 votes. Clinton’s running mate, Senator Tim Kaine, grew up in Missouri, and the state could be won with a large turnout in urban areas; however, this is where Rush Limbaugh country meets Ferguson and #BlackLivesMatter.
Montana. Obama lost this state by some 10,000 votes in 2008. Democratic Governor Steve Bullock is highly popular and is running for reelection. Clinton’s campaign organization in the state is impressive, whereas Trump seems to be taking Montana for granted.
Indiana. Trump’s running mate, Indiana Governor Mike Pence, could help keep this a red state; however, Democrat Evan Bayh is leading in the Senate race. In addition, the governor’s race is tight, meaning voter turnout should be high, which favors Democrats. Obama won this state in 2008 but lost it in 2012, when turnout was lower.
Arizona and Georgia should stay in the Republican column, even with their large minority population, but polls show that the race is close in both states.
Hillary Clinton will likely achieve an electoral landslide, and her campaign will increasingly focus on winning seats for Democrats in the U.S. Senate and House of Representatives.